Here's a little gem I discovered in some reading material to provide ancient support on the relationship between nerves, muscles, muscle response and health. This is useful information in connection with the "modern" practice in holistic circles using applied kinesiology/muscle testing.
Many aspects of modern medicine may not be as modern as some think. In fact, a number of today's common medical practices were already in place centuries ago in some lands. Consider, for example, the history of medicine in medieval times in the Middle East.
... Avicenna, a leader in the medical field, hailed from Bukhara, in modern Uzbekistan. He became one of the great physicians, philosophers, astronomers and mathematicians of the 11th century. Avicenna wrote an encyclopedia, The Canon of Medicine, which covered the whole range of known medical knowledge.
Avicenna stated in his Canon that tuberculosis is contagious, that disease can spread through water and soil, that emotions affect physical well-being, and that nerves transmit both pain and impulses for muscle contraction.
So, the art of muscle testing, applied kinesiology, is based on historical writings and discoveries of medical men from early times.
A Unique and Gentle Relief Technique replacing negative emotions with Love and Forgiveness.
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Monday, November 3, 2014
Religion and Limiting Beliefs
Religion: As a supportive
therapist, I would never presume to pass judgment on someone’s long-cherished
Faith in a so-called fundamentalist religion. After all, I’m working with each
individual’s “limiting beliefs”, so what a person’s limiting belief may be regarding
that Faith is not necessarily the Truth, even though they believe it to be true.
For someone else, that limiting belief is not true. So, in my Practice, it’s
not my job to judge a limiting belief as a basic tenant of that Faith. It’s
true for the client, and it’s my job to walk her through letting go of that
limiting belief and forgiving herself for allowing it to affect her life in
some way. Compare this with a traditional Faith, not a so-called
“fundamentalist” Faith. For example, even though there is documentation that
clergy have molested little boys, ruining their lives, and seemingly getting
just a slap on the hand, there are still new members joining that Faith, and
old members clinging to it. So, while, for some, that Faith has associated with
it a limiting belief that’s far from good, for others, that Faith is a
wonderful haven. Each view is true for each respective individual.
Very few of my clients come from fundamentalist religion. Most of my clients come from a background of traditional religion and they have their limiting beliefs, as well. I don’t believe that the Faith, itself, is necessarily the guilty party. In my experience, limiting beliefs are influenced by parents and other authoritative figures. A particular religion may seem like the worst thing to some people, while, to others, it is cherished. A cult is only a cult to those who don’t believe in it. Any religion can be labeled a cult. But that’s another topic.
What’s the comparison?
What percentage of clients have I had with a background from traditional
religion and what percentage of clients have I had with a background from a
fundamentalist religion? It can be a challenge to hold back in our personal
opinion with a client when it comes to religion, especially if it’s an area
we’ve had to work out in our own lives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)